for layout only

university of glasgow
skip navigation
HATII Logo

banner

for layout only
for layout only

Dr Maria Economou

Evaluation Strategy for the re-development of the displays and visitor facilities at the Museum and Art Gallery, Kelvingrove

Studying the visitors …

 Prepared for Glasgow Museums by the
Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute (HATII)
University of Glasgow

June 1999

HATII, University of Glasgow
Director: Dr Seamus Ross
11 University Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Tel: (0141) 330 5512 Fax: 330 3788
http://www.hatii.arts.gla.ac.uk



BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY

This documents outlines the strategy for evaluating the re-development of the displays and visitor facilities of the Museum and Art Gallery, Kelvingrove from July 1999 to July 2004.

It identifies a number of strategic goals that support the Museum’s overall mission and aims, and particularly the objectives of the re-display and developments taking place over the next years. The evaluation of the new displays and the study of the visitors will play a crucial part in achieving these aims.

This evaluation strategy outlines the main principles, approaches, and methods for assessing the use and effect of the Museum’s new displays and facilities, as well as key actions that should be implemented in the Museum’s everyday practice.

The aim of this strategy document is to:

  • set out the overall vision and context for the development of evaluation work in the Museum
  • ensure that the Museum staff understand the aims of the evaluation and how it can be incorporated in their everyday work
  • inform visitors and interested bodies how the Museum intends to implement evaluation to improve communication with its audience (both current and targeted) and the provision of services
  • assist in the communication and potential collaboration with external evaluation and other related consultants and researchers

The design of this strategy is set in the wider context of the cultural heritage community, where there is increasing recognition of the importance of evaluation, particularly when new technologies are used in displays and services (e.g. Department for Culture, Media and Sport 1999; Stiff 1998). Despite this increased awareness however, remarkably few institutions carry out systematic evaluation, even though they spend considerable resources in developing new exhibitions and applications. Even when evaluation studies are undertaken, they tend to be individual efforts of limited scope, without forming part of an overall plan or strategy. In most cases, evaluation work continues to be brought in at the last stages of projects, rather than be carefully thought out at the beginning and be integrated in the development process. The Museum recognises the important role that evaluation and audience consultation have to play in all its activities, and in this project in particular, where they are seen as an integral part of the re-development, to be employed at all its stages.


CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

2 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

2.1 The Museum and Art Gallery, Kelvingrove

2.2 The re-development of displays and visitor facilities

2.3 Purpose of the evaluation of re-development of displays and visitor facilities

2.4 Why evaluate museum displays, services, and facilities?

2.5 Evaluation to date

3 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND RELEVANT ACTIONS

GENERAL OBJECTIVES

3.1 Key Objective 1: Maintain an informed picture of the profile of visitors to the Museum

3.2 Key Objective 2: Try to understand what visitors want from a visit, their interests, preferences, and needs (qualitative evaluation)

3.3 Key Objective 3: Communicate with non-visitors and study their reasons for not visiting the Museum

3.4 Key Objective 4: Involve all members of curatorial and exhibition development staff with evaluation procedure and communication with the visitors

3.5 Key Objective 5: Keep in touch with the latest developments in visitor studies and evaluation research and translate their relevance to the Museum

OBJECTIVES RELATED TO SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT

3.6 Key Objective 6: Improve physical and intellectual access to the building

3.7 Key Objective 7: Improve physical access to the collections

3.8 Key Objective 8: Improve intellectual access to the collections

3.9 Key Objective 9: Create an Orientation Centre to improve the orientation and experience of visitors

3.10 Key Objective 10: Create discovery, event, and display study centres to enhance visitors' experience

3.11 Key Objective 11: Create Object Cinemas to enhance visitors' experience

3.12 Key Objective 12: Create Story displays to enhance visitors' experience

3.13 Key Objective 13: Improve visitor facilities

4 EVALUATION TIMESCALE AND COSTS

5 APPENDIX: Introduction to museum evaluation and visitor studies

5.1 Definitions and aims of museum evaluation

5.2 Short history and theoretical approaches to evaluation

5.3 Problems and difficulties

5.4 Types of evaluation

5.5 Evaluation methods and tools

6 BIBLIOGRAPHY

[top of page]

for layout only
for layout only